Bold truth: Maternity services need investment in people and training, not another round of reviews.
Once again, we face a report that exposes failures in maternity care—ranging from cruel comments and racism to cover-ups—underlining deficiencies in staffing and care environments. The NHS maternity system is in crisis, but this isn’t news to those on the front lines. For years, the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (now Maternity and Newborn Safety Investigations) and many other inquiries have pinpointed the same core issues, yielding roughly 748 recommendations that, if acted on, could substantially improve care.
Rather than directing funds to implement these proven recommendations, resources are being funneled into commissioning yet another review—one likely to restate what we already know. The way forward is clear: redirect investment to where it makes a real difference. We must rebuild maternity services on solid, safe foundations: robust, high-quality support; meaningful, practical training; and sustainable staffing levels for clinicians who tirelessly deliver care in chronically under-resourced environments. These dedicated professionals constantly navigate increasingly complex demands, often shaped by social media narratives that oversimplify and misrepresent the realities and risks of maternity care.
National guidance also needs a rethink to be realistic, flexible, and responsive to individual clinical needs, rather than pushing a rigid, one-size-fits-all approach. Most importantly, we must value and trust clinicians, enabling them to practice as skilled professionals within supportive systems that prioritize learning and improvement over endless audits and a culture driven by fear of litigation.
If we truly want better maternity care, the answer isn’t another report. It’s substantial investment in people, training, and environments that enable safe, compassionate practice.
Judith Robbins
Senior Midwife, London
Lady Amos’s interim report has sparked the familiar chorus: why haven’t lessons been learned? A key takeaway is that long lists of recommendations don’t empower healthcare staff. Instead, they can reinforce command-and-control cultures and foster toxicity, leading to inhumane behavior.
There remains little appetite to implement evidence-based good practice even when it exists. A practical next step would be to allocate inquiry budgets toward embedding the seven safety features in maternity units—developed by The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute in 2020—into everyday practice. This framework offers concrete support and stands in contrast to punitive advisories.
Alan Willson, Swansea
The article notes a shortage of midwives, yet the Royal College of Midwives reports that 31% of midwifery graduates can’t find jobs. Combine that with fragile midwifery units, managers who foster a climate of cover-up, poverty that worsens maternity outcomes in deprived areas, and the toxic mix of racism and austerity, and you have a systemic failure that is getting worse, not better.
Christine Connolly, Alnwick
Speaking from a deeply personal place, I want to echo a concern raised in Lady Amos’s interim report. After the trauma of an expected joyous event turning to tragedy, bereaved parents deserve humane treatment from hospital authorities. My daughter and son-in-law faced confusion, denial, obstruction, and deliberate delays in their four-year struggle for understanding and action, with no real institutional empathy. A simple, cost-free attitude shift from managers toward grieving families during early coping could be transformative.
To the NHS: please choose empathy and support over obstruction. Help, not hinder, especially for families navigating unimaginable loss.
Name and address supplied
